Download PDF

Dr. Michael J. O'Connell

Healthcare Consultant...

  • Barrington, NH

Work History


Ferguson unrest...

Dr. Michael J. O’Connell, Healthcare Consultant, Barrington, New Hampshire commented that the media is once again exploding over the issue of gender inequality regarding income.  So no better way of making the case than parading out Jennifer Lawrence, the eminent female star of the Hunger Games series et al, who earns a paltry $14 million per film.  Apparently that’s not as much as what a star leading man commands.  Who knew?  What a damn shame.

Why is it, Liberals are so quick to aim their weapons at CEOs and Wall Street tycoons, and the perceived glass ceilings, and yet ignore the conspicuously wealthy in Hollywood?  Could it be that what really matters to them is the politics of the fat cats?  The horror of a stockbroker earning $200,000 a year…this deserves Liberal protests, chest pounding and screams of outrage.  But the fact that Oprah earns $200,000 a month does not cause them a stir.  Interesting.

Liberals have always given the entertainment industry a pass on its arrogance and innumerable individual misdeeds, and the industry rewards this nod by donating its celebrity (and celebrity dollars) to Liberal politicians.  If Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are truly committed to reversing the earnings’ disparities, as they both claim in their debates, maybe they need to start including those glaring examples that are among their very donors.

Text Section


Text Section

Gun control…

Dr. Michael J. O’Connell, Barrington, New Hampshire, commented that it is rare that I agree 100% with any decision or remark President Obama makes.  In the wake of the church shooting in Charleston, South Carolina, he expressed the opinion, as he has many times before, that lack of gun control in this country is directly related to our number one ranking among industrialized nations in murders by firearms.  While there may be a dearth of direct evidence that gun controls are responsible for containment of violent shootings, the fact is that all countries with lower rates of violent crime also have serious gun control measures in place.  I would argue, as does Obama, that his opinion is indeed de facto. 


Dr. O’Connell added that to “prove” the causal relationship, a prospective scientific approach would be needed, but absolutely impossible to conduct.  Can you imagine doling our gun permits on a purely random basis, and mandating that all others turn in all their firearms?  Then for the next ten years the pattern of crimes would be followed and data collected.  Could never happen.  Another insoluble problem would be how to account for crime committed with weapons stolen from permit owners, or imported from regions outside of the region under ‘study’.  Clearly such a scientific experiment will not be conducted.  


I would argue that such experimentation is not necessary.  The reality is that the closest this country will ever come to ‘proof’ that gun control reduces violent crime is the ongoing worldwide, rather unscientific retrospective study, in which some countries ban firearms and some don’t.  The former enjoy markedly lower rates of crime using firearms.


Dr. O’Connell stressed that he fully understands firearms are featured in sport.  It’s a huge industry.  And in an ideal world one should be free to enjoy these sports.  However, isn’t there a point at which enjoyment by a few must be sacrificed to the interests of many?